Apologies for not having written sooner. It's been a difficult couple of weeks.
As I mentioned in the last post, R left on a Thursday, and Bn and S left a few days later. Which left me as the only expat in the house. And the only one sleeping in the house, other than the dog, Spikey.
A few comments on the living situation. Apparently, Bn, S, and R had been staying at MOH from Jan to the end of March, but they were paying a rather considerable amount for rent. So around the end of March, they found a house in the city to rent.
The owners of the house are a Haitian couple, a doctor and lawyer, upper middle class. They have 3 staff/servants: a cook, a housekeeper, and a gardener. They also have a semi-wild dog, Spikey. Apparently, when the lease started, the organization I'm working for got the staff and the dog, too.
That's all to say that during the day, I've had all 3 of the house staff and By around as company. And many days, I had By with me in the car as we went around town meeting people or running errands. By and the house staff are all Haitian, and By is the only one fluent in English.
At night, on the other hand, it's been just me, Spikey, and Jesus around. It was a little scary, especially the first few nights.
Before they left, R asked whether I'd be ok by myself at the house. I'd confidently said sure, thinking about the 2 years I lived in a single apartment unit by myself. But thinking back now, that was in an apartment complex, with a nighttime security guy for the apartment. And if there'd been any serious issues, I could have called 911, or gone to my neighbors.
Here, it's a different feeling. Especially with the warnings that different Haitians have told me, warnings of how there's a huge divide between rich and poor in Haiti that leads to some real resentment by the poor. My coworker S has commented on this, that she feels one of the huge spiritual influences in Haitian society is a spirit of fear and suspicion.
Related to the idea of class struggle, I met some guys who work for a fairly big NGO that specializes in disaster relief and development work.
I asked them what they thought the biggest problems in Haiti are. They mentioned two. The first is that Haitians are having too many kids and aren't able to take care of them. The economy and educational system aren't able to support so many (the percentages of those unemployed and of those uneducated have varied a little depending on who I've asked, but all the numbers I've heard are sky high). And at a family level, rather than a government or systemic level, it's a big cultural difference that here, a parent's obligations to his or her kids are quite different than in many other places. I'll explain that later in this post, but for now, I don't wish to digress too much.
But I'll digress slightly here. I asked a Haitian guy later about this, and he commented that it's part of the culture to have lots of kids. There's a Haitian proverb: "Children are a cane to lean on in one's old age." In other words, while Americans have social security and retirement accounts, in Haiti (and many parts of the world), you have kids because you expect them to take care of you later when you're old.
Anyway, the second big problem they mentioned is corruption. And the weakness of the rule of law. They commented that there's corruption in every country, anywhere you go. But in places that have a strong rule of law, corruption is limited. (I think of the internal affairs of a police department, internal auditors, corporate whistleblowers, and such.) But in places without a strong rule of law, it's more about who are the people with power, and how they can be influenced, persuaded, bribed. And in Haiti, it's so pervasive that it's just accepted--knowing people, making connections, giving money to contacts so that they'll help you, it's just how things are done.
They made this fascinating comment that in Haiti, as in a lot of countries, there's a very small, very rich, and very powerful minority. They control the wealth, and they control all the institutions in the country. In other words, they own the system. And on the other hand, there's a huge majority of the population that's very very poor. And in many other countries, when capitalism, free markets and such are introduced, the vast majority who are poor becomes somewhat better off, and the rich minority become richer. Way, way, richer.
So at some level, those who are rich are sometimes presented with a choice. Ok, you're rich now, but if you want real wealth, change the system so that everyone can benefit. In a number of countries, they choose to go for the vast wealth. But in Haiti, the answer has always been no. They don't want things to change because although they might become vastly more wealthy, they would lose control of the system. And they'd rather keep that.
Anyway, I'll add some comments on that first problem (the digression I previously avoided), which relates to family structure and the cultural obligations of parents to their kids in Haiti. In the US, parents either keep their kids (care for them, provide for them, etc), or give them up (either by giving them up for adoption or abandoning them). And we've got adoptions, foster care, and orphanages for kids whose parents are dead. (Question, if a kid's parents are unknown, does anyone know if they go to foster care or to an orphanage?)
In Haiti, things are structured differently. Unemployment here, by most accounts is somewhere on the order of 70%. So parents are often unable to provide. Biological parents (in most cases, just the biological mom) are willing to let their kids stay for extended periods of time (maybe even permanently) at "orphelinat." Orphelinat are orphanages, institutions where large groups of kids are raised, sheltered, fed, sometimes schooled. But these kids may or may not have living parents. They may or may not have been abandoned. Parents may just feel that they can't provide for their kid for the next few months, or year, or whatever, and so they place them at the orphelinat, but maybe they'll come and visit once in a while. And at any time they want, they can come back to the orphelinat and take their kids back.
There's also another institution for kids: creches. When a kid is sent to a creche, everyone knows it's for the purpose of adoption (which is pretty much always an international adoption in Haiti). So the kids at a creche are those who were completely abandoned by their parents and found on the street, or are the ones where mom (and maybe dad) gave a legal statement before a judge saying they understood they were giving up all parental rights over their kid.
These are the institutions that care for kids. Societally, there's also a lot of noninstitutional care of kids. There's some stuff with extended families, and lots of stuff with a sort of informal adoption, which almost always takes places with girls, not boys. And the dark side, restaviks, poor girls taken by well off families to be house servants/slaves in a pretty exploitative relationship. (I don't want to digress too much here, so perhaps I'll explain why later, or ask me if you're really curious.) I haven't heard a lot about how widespread prostitution is, so I don't know how often that happens, but I've certainly heard some anecdotes that have me shudder.
But I digress yet again. What came to mind while I was writing this post (and what led to the title) is an article I once read, part of the reading for the Perspectives course. The article is titled: "Prayer: Rebelling Against the Status Quo" (It's a really great article, and I just googled and found it
here:It's 3 pages. By all means, if you at all have the time, read it first, before reading on below.
It describes petitionary prayer in a new light. When the persistent widow comes to the unjust judge and pleads for justice, she's refusing to accept her current situation.
And the article relates that to us, when we're confronted with the fallen state of the world. Do we come to terms with things as they are, or do we refuse to accept what is wrong, unjust, that which is opposed to God?
All too often, for me it's the former, and not the latter.
I guess the use of the word "rebelling" in that context has such an interesting twist. I normally think of someone who's lawless, a kind of anti-authoritarian, maybe an anarchist or something. Satan was the first rebel: "better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven" from Milton's Paradise Lost.
But those who pray, who petition God to change things, who refuse to accept the injustice of things--they're rebels of another sort. Rebels against the world, the system set up by that first rebel.
Kind of turns things on their head, no?
Labels: Haiti